Arguments: Did BBC lie on Xinjiang?

Arguments on the Vladislav-style pro-China troll vlog:

中文评论：《在中共国恰饭的伏拉夫式洋网红的大忽悠》

English general comments:
Re: lots of mistakes in this video:
1, Why do you call BBC as BSB? Because "BBC" is the "sensitive word" in China? You're so afraid that your video can not get online? So funny to see you defend a sovereignty who forbids you to say what you are defending for.
2, lack of regulation does not necessarily mean there will be the abuse of the rule. Think about Xinhua news agency. No one regulates it on foreign news, based on your logic, Xinhua news agency is a liar on foreign news?
3, most source comes from one man? Funny, all news agencies understand the importance of multi-sources. Don't you know the satellite source or your search was blocked by China?
Last, just one question: your evidence, including those from Hua Chunying, came from Twitter, can normal Chinese people get on Twitter to see the evidence themselves?

Arguments with some web users selected:

Re: What you repeated again and again was: I can prove myself, and western media lie. -- Is it? really?
This foreign vloger just REPEATED what Hua Chunying said and made himself popular (and made money) among Chinese audience. He just did some copy-and-paste, not so-called "disclosed western media's lie"

Re: Just check the serial news reports to Xinjiang Uighur camps and the satellite maps, and compare to the repeated cliche of Xinhua news agency, who did the copy-&-paste work? West or Xinhua Agency?
OFCOM may not have power over BBC world news, but NO bureau has power over Xinhua News Agency too, understand? If BBC could lie, Xinhua News Agency would lie too.

Re: hehe, Iraq = Xinjiang? some girl dumped you = the girl would dump all the other men? You're funny.
I agree with you on "lies will be exposed sooner or later", but do you DARE to ask Xinhua News Agency or CCP to erase the limitations to foreign news agencies to go to Xinjiang or the limitations to Uighur to go abroad to HELP to prove China's so-called innocence? You have no balls to do so, because Xinhua News Agency and CCP would NOT dare to open.

Re: Hilarious, you are about to expose xinhua's lie's? Hahahaha, you don't have to, because there're so many of them, and you have no time to do it. Everyone knows Xinhua is not a news agency, but a propaganda agency. Xinhua would lie as CCP does.

Re: I said already: the best way to defend China and your belief is to persuade China to open Xinjiang for foreign reporters and allow Xinjiang Uighur people to travel abroad to prove their really happy life if any. But, do you DARE to?
Funny.

Re: You have been fooled by CCP media.
1, "Western media lie because they are money involved in it"? What is your logic here? The West need to sell cotton so they defamed Xinjiang? Otherwise, which kind of "money" you talked here can be big enough to support almost all the west (including Turkey) to criticize China?
2, "even if China opens the door to those journalist to come to Xinjiang, they will report false information anyway"? If you can NOT find a friend after your door-open, it is YOUR problem. Think about it again carefully. You may argue "all west media have been controlled by governments just like China does", sorry, you've made a mistake here. I truly believe there are some innocent media in the West who can fairly report news, don't you believe?
3, China permitted those chosen "ordinary pro-China people" to go to Xinjiang to help it propaganda. These "ordinary people" are mostly money-involved (CCP doesn't pay them, but they are mostly vloggers making money in China's social media). Those "ordinary people" disliked by China would not be permitted to go to Xinjiang, just like John Sudworth the reporter who got forced to go to Taiwan because he had been threatened.

Re: 1，"the lock on Xinjiang" refers to the lock on ALL minority people rather than so-called "extremists" like you said. Minority people in Xinjiang have great difficulty in applying passports (almost impossible) and harshly discriminated in inner-land in China: they have to report themselves to local police-stations, and refused by hotels often:

https://cinacn.blogspot.com/2021/04/blog-post_7.html

https://cinacn.blogspot.com/2018/04/blog-post_74.html

Do not be too surprised by these news, you did not know it because the Uighur people had been muted.

2, Do you know from which country ISIS buy weapons? China. See the statistics:

https://cinacn.blogspot.com/2018/12/isis.html

So do you agree that ISIS is a China-supporting terrorist organization?

Re:
1, What you said demonstrated you were poorly-educated in economics and can only follow what CCP media told you(yes, brainwashed): First, Xinjiang does NOT export cotton, instead, Xinjiang IMPORT cotton, understand?
https://cinacn.blogspot.com/2021/03/20.html
Second, America of course needs strong economies to be business partners to buy and sell. So there is absolutely NO so-called "slow down China's economy so that they dont surpass u.s. economically", understand? This conspiracy sentence came from some poorly-educated CCP propagandist and you followed it, very funny. Think about it, if what you said were true, then America would make best friends with poorest countries in the world, right?
2, "the western media is not looking to find out the truth" is you prejudice. You had decided that the western media were bad and you started to find evidence to prove it. It was meaningless. The western media, in your mind, are already villains. You started to talk based on this viewpoints, and you twisted your whole logic.
If you want to see the normal life of regular Uighur people, I have one for you:
https://cinacn.blogspot.com/2021/04/blog-post_5.html
See how Uighur is discriminated in domestic China, you would know why CCP media is not credible.
3, If you want yourself and CCP both credible, then open it, eliminate the limitation, not just to some pro-China and money-making vloggers, but also to general public reporters. You said lots of "ordinary people" could defend China, Why don't you/CCP find more friends?
One hand, you insisted that CCP is innocent, on the other hand, you refuse the necessity of open to wider reporters into Xinjiang;
One hand, you insisted that funding is bad because "Someone funded by America to defame Xinjiang", but on the other hand, you praised these "funded pro-China vloggers" to copy-and-paste what Hua Chunying said just to fool his fans to make some quick money?
You really have Double-Standard here.

Re:

1，You do not know the trade between ISIS and China, so you can't be sure whether China sold the weapons for free or at a low price or based on a normal international trade price. China is good at this "give me money and I don't care who is good who is bad" games. For example, China sold weapons to Both Iraq and Iran when both of them were at war against each other:
https://cinacn.blogspot.com/2016/05/blog-post_23.html
See? Chins has been good at making such shameless money.
2，So it is not surprised China made lots of shameless money in post-war Iraq while at the same time scolding America "murdering Iraqi people", why? You China took advantage of America and made lots of money and pretend you are innocent? How shame are you, China! America saved Iraqi people from some totalitarian sovereignty and built a better business atmosphere for YOU for CHINA and for the WORLD! China took advantage of it making lots of shameless money and thought himself innocent because Chinese army was not blood-polluted? America helped you but you framed America? What a villain you are! Shame on you, China!