粉红五毛：“在我的历史书里，我就是正义”

Arguments: From Xinjiang to Taiwan

Funny arguments to educate some ignorant Chinese troll below the same video:

First comment (the start of the whole dialogue):

Re:
Fair? lots of mistakes here:
1, Why do you call BBC as BSB? Because "BBC" is the "sensitive word" in China? You're so afraid that your video can not get online? So funny to see you defend a sovereignty who forbids you to say what you are defending for.
2, lack of regulation does not necessarily mean there will be the abuse of the rule. Think about Xinhua news agency. No one regulates it on foreign news, based on your logic, Xinhua news agency is a liar on foreign news?
3, most source comes from one man? Funny, all news agencies understand the importance of multi-sources. Don't you know the satellite source or your search was blocked by China?
Last, just one question: your evidence, including those from Hua Chunying, came from Twitter, can normal Chinese people get on Twitter to see the evidence themselves?

Re:
You're so funny, "Chinese media would never ever ignite the hatred"? Really? Almost all mainstream media in China claim war against America, Japan and Taiwan, especially Global Times (huanqiu shibao) or CCYL (gong qing tuan), you want evidence to prove your innocence and peace love? You're really funny. When you're used to to lie around you, you are surely unable to accept any truth.

Re:
That's the apparent double-standard: China's Official media claimed to kill Japanese and Taiwanese, you said you "never felt they caused hate",  none other western Official media claimed any war against China, but you said they were to start wars? -- Are you kidding? Don't "trust" any media, just examine them fairly, you would know your ridiculous double-standard. Do you know which country aroused anger and hatred? you got it: it's China. Give you a piece of quantitative evidence:
https://cinacn.blogspot.com/2017/02/blog-post_13.html （in Chinese）
See? The only country trying to arouse people's hatred against other countries is CHINA. Funny?

You want to prove Xinjiang people (esp. Uighur people) live good lives? simple, just prove they have freedom to live domestically, to travel freely, to speak freely, to go abroad freely. -- Can you? Sorry, you can't. Because we all know Xinjiang people, esp. Uighur people don't have these freedom. The detention camps and forced labor are regular methods against Uighur people. Just think about so many "sensitive words" in China's internet, everyone can understand the large pressure on Xinjiang people.

Re:
No kill? Oh, come on, do you know any Chinese characters? Tell me, "宁可台湾不长草！也要解放台湾岛", "武力解放台湾是中国的内政" means NO killing? Are you out of your mind? Can you learn some Chinese character before you fool yourself?
Taiwan never hate you no matter who you are, but Taiwan is Taiwan, Mainland is Mainland. Taiwan is not a part of Mainland. If you claim Taiwan should belong to Mainland, then it is the invasion, an intruding war. Mainland China claims war so many times against Taiwan but no one dare to do it for real because everyone knows Mainland China would collapse if there were to be a war.
USA is not my Daddy, but may be the Daddy for so many CCP officials, including Xi Jinping. What do you mean "the war in 2017"? Then where is your anger from?
"If you don't like Jason's Channel you can leave": a typical brain-washed sentence. This is a youtube channel, anyone can comment here. If you want to be public and make money on it, then I can comment on it. You know what, Jason needs me more than you, because he needs someone to help him to heat the conversation so he can make more money. If there are only fans here, he would make less money. Pretty bad for you, huh?

Re:
Your defending is so funny, how can you prove yourself genuine and true then? or how can you prove Jason's vlog is genuine and true? He did nothing but just repeated what Hua Chunying said in the press meeting, and you said He is genuine and true? hahaha, you're so funny.

Sorry to disappoint you and kindly remind: almost all other countries understand legally that "Taiwan is not a part of China" because there are two different visas. Taiwan visa is much more convenient than China visa. Taiwan "does not need to dare to declare independent", as Taiwan is factually independent.
BTW, President Tsai "does not have balls" of course, because she is a lady.

Maybe you should learn some REAL history:
大清国《大清一统志》说得很清楚：台湾不是中国的，怎么那么多傻boy还傻乎乎地“自古以来”呢？看不懂史书吗：
https://cinacn.blogspot.com/2016/01/blog-post_30.html
The history book from Qing Dynasty claimed clearly that "Taiwan is NOT a part of China", then why so many fools insist "Since ancient times"?

Re:
It is NOT true of course. If Hua were true ("lack of regulations means BBC would spread fake news"), then a natural conclusion will be "lack of regulations means Xinhua News Agency would spread fake news". -- Do you agree?

Sorry, ROC's constitution says "Taiwan is part of ROC", not "Taiwan is part of Mainland". UN and USA and lots of countries admit Taiwan visa, which is enough to be an independent sovereignty.
I speak here because I know lots of foreigners need to know the truth of Taiwan, so it is OK for you trolls to make some dirty money on it

Stop being patronizing and stop looking down upon people stop being a racist!
=============
You really need to shout these words to CCP, because it is CCP who is the racist against Uighur people:
https://cinacn.blogspot.com/2019/01/blog-post_17.html
Try defend for your CCP money donor

Re:
 the railway tragedy happening a week ago in Taiwan
==========
Thanks. In July 23, 2011, There was a much heavier railway accident happened in Wenzhou, Zhejiang, and Taiwan also expressed deepest condolence to the Mainland. But Taiwan would NOT learn the Mainland way to cover the truth or mute the media.
Your government should take more care about people's lives and life quality rather than wanting to get political capitol and fake political power.....very very sad!!!!!What a shame!!!!

To repeat what Hua Chunying the liar said would make you money, and you called this liar's money "the money for the justice"? hehehe, of course, why not? you are just one troll of the liar's government, of course you have to defend for your wu mao.

 "the kindness of Mainland"? excuse me, Mainland's kindness is always for its Russia daddy and North Korea daddy, never for Chinese. Think about how many people starved to death in 1959-1962 in Mainland.

Calling mainland is because both Mainland and Taiwan belong to China
=============
Your China is PRC, Taiwan at most belongs to ROC. There are two China's, like there are two Korea's. Your mind is full of mess so it is very hard for you to differentiate the two China's. Sorry for you, but you need a better geography teacher. Thank you for your stupidity here and amuse everyone as an April Fool.

Re:

come on!! more arguement!!! You can tell me three CHinas!!!!
================
Reading your hysterical comments is kind of fun. Just one question: have you read the true legitimate <Treaty of Peace with Japan> signed in 1951? You did NOT know, of course, or you would not get so hysteric.
https://cinacn.blogspot.com/2021/04/v.html
This is a link for you to learn from. Hope you would be wiser. You get wiser, you get less hysteric.

Re:
Sorry to disappoint you, as I was slapping your face. If you deny the necessity of international laws and treaties and choose "power speaks", which means to rationalize the violence/power, then at the same time you rationalize the violence/power against CCP. That is, if CCP could oppress Xinjiang Uighur people, Uighur people could also use their violence/power against CCP, to resist the CCP terror with their own terror. <- and you rationalize all of it.
You always say USA use its power than international laws and treaties, the only reason why you did NOT know. Because in your education, CCP lied to you and concealed everything it wanted. So you have been kept ignorant. The more ignorant you are, the easier you got irritable. Funny, it is so funny to see you completely did NOT know  <Treaty of Peace with Japan> while participating this conversion, which is too hard for you.

Re:
It is funny for you history-ignorant idiots who only dare to trace the terrorist attach to 2014 in Kunming. It is so EASY to accuse so-called terrorists' violence, but why did this come from? what is the source of the Xinjiang terrorism? You did NOT know. Why did you fail to trace the history to see how CCP oppressed Xinjiang Uighur people before 2014? or trace it until the early time of 20 century when CCP SUPPORTED Xinjiang-independence before 1949? You did not understand the history at all, so you got fooled and brainwashed by CCP's terrifying/disgraceful/disgusting logic:
https://cinacn.blogspot.com/2013/07/blog-post_318.html
Do you think CCP really care about Muslim or local people's life? You're so naive and foolish.
Whether USA lied to Chinese is not the topic of these comments. Why do you focus so much on USA? You pay tax to USA or you have lots of "Red Second Generation/Princelings" friends living in USA? "USA is evil" is NOT the proof of "CCP China is innocent", understand?  The lack of fundamental logic education made you brainwashed by CCP's fabricated textbooks.
And USA is not the dad of anyone at all. On the contrary, Soviet/Russia IS really CCP China's daddy. Russia is the ONLY country who publicly and legitimately SUPPORT local independence? Putin once said "Local people do not need the approval by the central authorities, by the government, to take the necessary measures for self-determination." Do you understand the influence of what Putin said to Xinjiang, Taiwan and Tibet? CCP China was totally mute and deleted all the Chinese news reports on this and pretended nothing had happened. Hahahahaha, so now you see Russia is really the DADDY of CCP China, even Russia slapped PRC's face, PRC would smile and offer Russia daddy another half of its ugly face.
I never say "what you hear from western media is definitely true", I said clearly: you have to think and judge by yourself, and think about the reason why CCP China bans the internet and locks the mutual communication in and out of Xinjiang. There is no 100% true or 100% false, but CCP China always conceals something and you know it is far less credible. That's it.
Maybe you should follow your own advice, i.e., read more books especially in Chinese. When you wanted to join the talk about Taiwan, you at least should have read some related history files such as <Treaty of Peace with Japan> or even Taiwan constitution as you took as the example. But you failed. You knew nothing about these files and made yourself like a trapped frog which knew only the cliche taught to you from CCP. Could you please jump out of the well where you dwell in? What can you see?




==Ongoing==

Arguments: Did BBC lie on Xinjiang?

Arguments on the Vladislav-style pro-China troll vlog:

中文评论：《在中共国恰饭的伏拉夫式洋网红的大忽悠》

English general comments:
Re: lots of mistakes in this video:
1, Why do you call BBC as BSB? Because "BBC" is the "sensitive word" in China? You're so afraid that your video can not get online? So funny to see you defend a sovereignty who forbids you to say what you are defending for.
2, lack of regulation does not necessarily mean there will be the abuse of the rule. Think about Xinhua news agency. No one regulates it on foreign news, based on your logic, Xinhua news agency is a liar on foreign news?
3, most source comes from one man? Funny, all news agencies understand the importance of multi-sources. Don't you know the satellite source or your search was blocked by China?
Last, just one question: your evidence, including those from Hua Chunying, came from Twitter, can normal Chinese people get on Twitter to see the evidence themselves?

Arguments with some web users selected:

Re: What you repeated again and again was: I can prove myself, and western media lie. -- Is it? really?
This foreign vloger just REPEATED what Hua Chunying said and made himself popular (and made money) among Chinese audience. He just did some copy-and-paste, not so-called "disclosed western media's lie"

Re: Just check the serial news reports to Xinjiang Uighur camps and the satellite maps, and compare to the repeated cliche of Xinhua news agency, who did the copy-&-paste work? West or Xinhua Agency?
OFCOM may not have power over BBC world news, but NO bureau has power over Xinhua News Agency too, understand? If BBC could lie, Xinhua News Agency would lie too.

Re: hehe, Iraq = Xinjiang? some girl dumped you = the girl would dump all the other men? You're funny.
I agree with you on "lies will be exposed sooner or later", but do you DARE to ask Xinhua News Agency or CCP to erase the limitations to foreign news agencies to go to Xinjiang or the limitations to Uighur to go abroad to HELP to prove China's so-called innocence? You have no balls to do so, because Xinhua News Agency and CCP would NOT dare to open.

Re: Hilarious, you are about to expose xinhua's lie's? Hahahaha, you don't have to, because there're so many of them, and you have no time to do it. Everyone knows Xinhua is not a news agency, but a propaganda agency. Xinhua would lie as CCP does.

Re: I said already: the best way to defend China and your belief is to persuade China to open Xinjiang for foreign reporters and allow Xinjiang Uighur people to travel abroad to prove their really happy life if any. But, do you DARE to?
Funny.

Re: You have been fooled by CCP media.
1, "Western media lie because they are money involved in it"? What is your logic here? The West need to sell cotton so they defamed Xinjiang? Otherwise, which kind of "money" you talked here can be big enough to support almost all the west (including Turkey) to criticize China?
2, "even if China opens the door to those journalist to come to Xinjiang, they will report false information anyway"? If you can NOT find a friend after your door-open, it is YOUR problem. Think about it again carefully. You may argue "all west media have been controlled by governments just like China does", sorry, you've made a mistake here. I truly believe there are some innocent media in the West who can fairly report news, don't you believe?
3, China permitted those chosen "ordinary pro-China people" to go to Xinjiang to help it propaganda. These "ordinary people" are mostly money-involved (CCP doesn't pay them, but they are mostly vloggers making money in China's social media). Those "ordinary people" disliked by China would not be permitted to go to Xinjiang, just like John Sudworth the reporter who got forced to go to Taiwan because he had been threatened.

Re: 1，"the lock on Xinjiang" refers to the lock on ALL minority people rather than so-called "extremists" like you said. Minority people in Xinjiang have great difficulty in applying passports (almost impossible) and harshly discriminated in inner-land in China: they have to report themselves to local police-stations, and refused by hotels often:

https://cinacn.blogspot.com/2021/04/blog-post_7.html

https://cinacn.blogspot.com/2018/04/blog-post_74.html

Do not be too surprised by these news, you did not know it because the Uighur people had been muted.

2, Do you know from which country ISIS buy weapons? China. See the statistics:

https://cinacn.blogspot.com/2018/12/isis.html

So do you agree that ISIS is a China-supporting terrorist organization?

Re:  
1, What you said demonstrated you were poorly-educated in economics and can only follow what CCP media told you(yes, brainwashed): First, Xinjiang does NOT export cotton, instead, Xinjiang IMPORT cotton, understand?
https://cinacn.blogspot.com/2021/03/20.html
Second, America of course needs strong economies to be business partners to buy and sell. So there is absolutely NO so-called "slow down China's economy so that they dont surpass u.s. economically", understand? This conspiracy sentence came from some poorly-educated CCP propagandist and you followed it, very funny. Think about it, if what you said were true, then America would make best friends with poorest countries in the world, right?
2, "the western media is not looking to find out the truth" is you prejudice. You had decided that the western media were bad and you started to find  evidence to prove it. It was meaningless. The western media, in your mind, are already villains. You started to talk based on this viewpoints, and you twisted your whole logic.
If you want to see the normal life of regular Uighur people, I have one for you:
https://cinacn.blogspot.com/2021/04/blog-post_5.html
See how Uighur is discriminated in domestic China, you would know why CCP media is not credible.
3, If you want yourself and CCP both credible, then open it, eliminate the limitation, not just to some pro-China and money-making vloggers, but also to general public reporters. You said lots of "ordinary people" could defend China, Why don't you/CCP find more friends?
One hand, you insisted that CCP is innocent, on the other hand, you refuse the necessity of open to wider reporters into Xinjiang;
One hand, you insisted that funding is bad because "Someone funded by America to defame Xinjiang", but on the other hand, you praised these "funded pro-China vloggers" to copy-and-paste what Hua Chunying said just to fool his fans to make some quick money?
You really have Double-Standard here.

Re:

1，You do not know the trade between ISIS and China, so you can't be sure whether China sold the weapons for free or at a low price or based on a normal international trade price. China is good at this "give me money and I don't care who is good who is bad" games. For example, China sold weapons to Both Iraq and Iran when both of them were at war against each other:
https://cinacn.blogspot.com/2016/05/blog-post_23.html
See? Chins has been good at making such shameless money.
2，So it is not surprised China made lots of shameless money in post-war Iraq while at the same time scolding America "murdering Iraqi people", why? You China took advantage of America and made lots of money and pretend you are innocent? How shame are you, China! America saved Iraqi people from some totalitarian sovereignty and built a better business atmosphere for YOU for CHINA and for the WORLD! China took advantage of it making lots of shameless money and thought himself innocent because Chinese army was not blood-polluted? America helped you but you framed America? What a villain you are! Shame on you, China!

Re: To build factories inside prisons would be the answer for "locked + forced labor".

Re: Check the video again if you can. The guy only repeated what Hua Chunying the China spokeswoman said. You called this a proof or a troll?

==Ongoing==

“二等菠萝卖给大陆”的台农是野蛮人吗？为什么别国会觉得“强大的中国是威胁”？

@倪文顥：我想你没有读懂我的观点，我的看法是，因为中国变强，周边国家感到威胁。同样，因为中国的经济发展，本国的利益关联范围也在扩大。我国要的其实是自由贸易和全球化，要在老龄化危机爆发前实现产业升级。至于文明世界 ，我和墙内的朋友一样，现在是2021年，我们看不到文明世界和野蛮世界。但是我们看得到野蛮的人。核平台湾的是野蛮人，把莱猪做成肉松给大陆一样是野蛮人，你觉得呢这位菠萝小哥是不是野蛮人呢。

==答==

乍一听，这位网友的观点和大陆的主流政治教育似乎有所不同，但细细一品，其实还是一样的模糊不清：

1，“因为中国变强，周边国家感到威胁”这句话，和“落后就要挨打”一体两面，其实都是源自骨子里在强权崇拜和丛林法则下的深入骨髓的自卑（对，只有自卑，没有自信和自尊）。“挨打、没朋友是因为中国落后”，可中国富强起来以后还是没朋友，是因为“邻国都感到威胁，觉得中国危险，都怕中国”，——所以中国始终还是没朋友！中国的教育和主流价值观，从来只是“抢不来别人的别人就会抢走我们”的强盗土匪逻辑，没有和平相处的逻辑。从1978年中国改革开放算起，这么多年了，中国一直没有融入文明世界，一直和“普世价值观”格格不入，总感觉要么当老大，要么当奴才，其实也就是同样的表现。这个价值观的直接后果是：明明很多时候是契约和合同的问题，但中国人只能偏狭地上升为道德或者“霸权-反霸权”的问题，要么是外国霸权打中国，要么是中国霸权打外国，从来就没有和平相处的时候。累不累啊？

2，很有趣的是，哪怕是在这一段短短的话里，前后几句话也是互相矛盾的。后面既然说“因为中国的经济发展，本国的利益关联范围也在扩大”，那么，难道中国强大了是一件坏事？只有国家越来越强大，资金和资源越来越多，工业、技术储备越来越雄厚，才会有越来越多的国家和地区来跟你进行自由贸易和全球化分工啊，本国的产业也才能更好更快地实现产业升级啊。——为什么强大之后反而会让别国“感到威胁”呢？难道强大而讲道理的一个贸易体反而会让别国感到威胁？只有一种可能：中国强大了，但是中国不讲道理，所以才会让别人“感到威胁”。

3，最后说到视频里这位菠萝小哥是不是野蛮人，很明显，——当然不是啊！菠萝交易是双方自主自愿的贸易行为，大陆有农产品进口标准，有农产品检疫制度。只要符合大陆的农产品进口标准，遵守大陆的农产品检疫制度，缴纳关税，那当然就可以出口菠萝给大陆啊！不管是几等菠萝，满足这个标准当然就可以。有买有卖，对等交易，又不是大陆这样带着警察去强拆，双方自由自愿，一手交钱一手交货。说白了，大陆自己的进口标准低，所以台农卖满足这个进口标准的二等凤梨给你，大陆又有什么怨言呢？有这功夫，为什么不去学学日本，看看日本是怎么规定的进口标准和检疫制度、所以才会有台农出口到日本的都是一等凤梨。要说野蛮人，这种“明明是自己制定的标准低、却反过来去怪别人给的东西不好”的搞法才是真正的野蛮人。当然，就最近的新闻而言，明明是政治封杀，却打着检疫旗号，这同样是野蛮人。

[问答]疫情会催生中国的文艺复兴吗？

==原问==

我打心里希望这种防疫状态在中国长期持续，将会催生现代中国的文艺复兴。

对个人而言，长期戴着口罩，人与人之间保持距离，相对独立，中华垃圾农耕酒桌文化（尤其是北方）将失去生存空间，中国人整体会更像南方人，甚至是日本人，人与人之间保持优雅的社交礼仪，称呼先生小姐而不是勾肩搭背称大哥大姐。

地方行政无法像以往一样暴力管理社会——现在还可以，那是因为大家认为疫情很快会结束。

因为无法大型集会，中央无法有效统治命令地方，地方将会更独立自主，顾忌本土民生问题。

军队，武警无法大规模集结，国家暴力机关统治力度大幅削弱。监狱，看守所无法集中关押，不能再随便关押越来越多的言论犯禁等轻罪。

参照黑死病的历史，若武汉肺炎几年内无法根治，将会迎来现代中国版的文艺复兴，九十九年成大错和推背图其他预言一样成真。



==答==

恐怕和题主的“期望”相反：如果疫情持续的话，只会有越来越强的奥威尔式的独裁控制，而不会有任何文艺复兴。

疫情对共产党来说就是一个天赐的福音（如果不是武汉实验室漏毒的话）：如同烧掉粮仓的大火，疫情不但掩盖了共产党的政绩无能（譬如在2020年消灭贫困这种大话），成为共产党保护伞，而且非常有效地在信息控制的情况下让老百姓对共产党的支持率（借用这个词）有所上升。从官方媒体到各种自媒体甚至网民自发的讨论圈，大多数被限制了独立思考的人都觉得“多亏了党的领导才战胜了疫情”。

既掩盖了自己的无能，又增强了自己的领导，所以共产党一定会继续接着疫情推行只有在疫情中的管制措施，并把它常态化。就好比之前地铁安检是打着北京奥运会的名义、后来打着防火灾的名义，现在已经不怎么喊口号了，因为已经常态化了。而疫情之后的常态化之一就是各种小程序、app之类的授权监控手段的推广使用。

和题主的想象相反，疫情中党借助现代化的科技手段对各级政府的控制其实更严了，也更加有效了。因为现在不但可以实时监控定位，还能实时监控效果。疫情时期很多基层官员被迅速训斥或被降级就说明了这一点。

党的高层还可以通过媒体大肆宣传自己的亲民形象，塑造“皇上是好的，都是地方官把事情办坏了”的圣主形象，把地方民生的黑锅甩给地方官僚。水浒传里三阮兄弟唱的山歌“酷吏赃官都杀尽，忠心报答赵官家”就是民间这种心态的反映。

至于军警特等政府暴力手段，更是会得到极大的扩张，因为这个时候不但共产党可以借助疫情公然扩张暴力执法团队（招募大批临时保安等），而且被招募到的保安往往会陷入一种虚无的自豪感而更加凶狠地执行党的暴力命令。某个地方曝光的巡防队员冲到当地居民家中、掀翻他们的麻将桌并怒斥他们没有互相隔离就是滥用执法的证明。

综上，如果疫情持续（甚至可能被共产党人为延续），对共产党的统治是利大于弊的，但却根本不会有“文艺复兴”。

——因为赵丹说了：管得太具体，文艺没希望。

引文链接

[问答]文化大革命的无产阶级人民民主专政是对的？

==原问==

==答==

您这是刚从乌有之乡网出来吧？还是长眠了40年刚刚才苏醒？什么叫无产阶级人民民主专政？共产主义之下，什么时候有过人民民主？从苏联开始，哪个领导人是真的被人民选出来的？哪个人民代表是真的被老百姓选出来的？共产党的人大代笔申纪兰都说得很清楚：“我是人大代笔，我从来不和选民沟通。”——这就是你夸奖的人民民主？那么多独立候选人说了要参选人大代笔，为什么后来都被共产党打压？难道独立候选人都是坏人？这是不是人民民主？你问问共产党，敢不敢放开让大陆的民众真的自己投票而不是搞等额选举？

只要共产党还有“等额选举”，就永远不是你说的“人民民主”。文化大革命根本就不是什么人民民主专政，只不过是毛泽东为了重新巩固自己的权力欲望罢了。注定要造成混乱的，因为毛泽东的本意就是要混乱。有没有人利用，都是会混乱的。

其次，除了文化大革命之外，你对印度的常识也要纠正：印度是搞过共产主义的，而且人家也是跟苏联一度打得火热（现在关系也不差，俄罗斯卖给印度的战斗机就是比卖给中国的更先进），所以印度搞不好，跟什么人民民主没有关系。恰恰相反，印度是因为搞了共产主义，所以发展才被停滞的。

你的问题不在于逻辑的欠缺，是在于常识的匮乏。

[问答]相比象形文字，拼音文字有何优点？

==原问==

我最近上网查了一下，我了解到象形文字，比如汉字，是一种表意文字，同一种文字可以有不同的读法。比如：
[li]根据楔形文字，其发展趋势是简化。「在苏美尔的最早记录中，使用的符号约有两千个左右，但经过600多年的改进，在公元前2900年左右时，符号的数目已经削减到六百个左右。符号进一步简化，最后演变为楔形刻痕的组合，基本笔划有四种：横、竖、斜和折。这就是楔形文字。」[/li]
[li]根据圣书体，埃及的意音文字中表形的部分不是很发达。「真正的表形文字不多，多数是借数个表形文字的读音来表示其它的概念。」[/li]
[li]而甲骨文，出现较晚，但意音文字体系高度发达，达到数千个单字，后不断增加，今有数万。相比之下，西元前一千年的腓尼基字母已经高度简化。[/li]
拼音文字是表音文字，比如说英文、世界语、拉丁语、腓尼基字母等等，是由字母组成拼接成单词组成文字。比如：
英文，由26个字母组成，由26个字母组成一个单词进而形成文字。
希腊文，主要由字母组成，由字母组成一个单词进而形成文字。
拉丁语，主要由字母组成，由字母组成一个单词进而形成文字。
拼音文字的特点就是表音，一个单词只能有且只有一种读音，每一个单词都只能表达同一种事物。
相比象形文字，拼音文字有何优势？

==答==

题主可能把象形文字等同于汉语了，把拼音文字等同于英语，大面儿上这没有什么错，但并不完全，这个问题应该分成两个部分来看：

1，汉语是不是就是象形文字？

其实不是。汉字的造字手段主要有四种：象形、指事、会意、形声。其实“象形”只是汉字来源的最原始的一种，汉字里面的山、水、日、月这些最原始最粗浅且有大家都熟知的具体生活形象的汉字一般就是这么来的。而在语言文化发展的下一个阶段、抽象思维开始发展的时候，象形文字的比例就大大降低了。所以现在汉字里的最常见的造字方式其实是形声字：一个汉字分成两个部分，一部分是声旁，表示读音，另一部分是形旁，表示含义。比如妈，玛，码，蚂，吗，这些字基本都能读准（声旁：马），也都能猜出来大概的含义（形旁：偏旁部首）。但这些都不是象形文字造出来的，而是形声结构的汉字。

2，汉字和拼音文字的比较

明白了汉字的四种造字方式和象形的关系，就能大概清楚汉字和拼音文字（以英语为例）的比较：

首先是拼音文字学习成本低，学习速度快，能读就能写。这个是官方认证过的，中国大陆49年之后搞汉字教育改革，一度想要完全拼音化，最重要的理由之一就是扫盲（“扫盲”这个词是不是都有点陌生了）。后来才定下来用简化汉字的方案。而早在延安时期，就已经试行过农村用拼音文字扫盲的方案。

其次，人对语言文字的处理是建立在语音基础上的，比如现在在这里打字的基本全都是拼音输入，五笔之类的估计凤毛麟角。再强调方块字的美感，它也只是一种信息传播媒介，是靠语音作为基础的。比如，英文的sneeze这个词，对应汉语的“打喷ti”，在无提示的情况下，基本没有中国人能动笔写出来“喷ti”这个汉字词。

其三，强大的造新词能力。语言是不断随社会更新发展的，汉字很难推出“新造字”，所以只能靠已有的汉字不断组成新词，来描述社会新生事物。但英语这种拼音文字，完全可以通过词根、前缀、后缀的不同搭配来派生出不同的词。英文词看起来多，但其实对英文词根熟悉的话，完全可以理解英文词的大致含义。

其四，英语更精确。英语本身存在多种时态、语态，单个语句就能相对清晰地表达完整的意思。而汉字属于孤立语，基本需要从上下文来判断本句的含义，语义歧义非常常见。这一点对于文学创作来说，可能是好事，但对于语言表达来说，却不够精确。鲁迅（当时支持汉字拼音化方案）在杂文里举例的“此一生或彼一生”就是一个例子。

其五，抽象思维。前面说了，汉字的象形造字法其实是最为原始的造字方式，既然保留了原始的“象形”，其实意味着在抽象思维方面是偏弱的，结果也就是整个汉语体系的抽象思维都落后于拼音文字体系。汉语在描述抽象事物的事物，往往要加上具体事物来“以物抒怀”，譬如“先生之风，山高水长”。这个在文学方面也许很有感染力，但在体现抽象思维的哲学、人文方面就远远不足。中国基本没有自己的哲学体系，最高成就也就是王阳明的心学那个阶段，便已无法再进，恐怕和汉字本身的特点有很大关系。与之相比，拼音文字的古希腊发展出古希腊哲学、古印度发展出因明学（逻辑学），都是抽象思维的巨大发展。

最后，汉字当然也有优点，比如汉字的特点就很适合发弹幕。所以类似B站之类的弹幕网站主要盛行在方块字体系的东亚。

并非文字学科班出身，纯粹手打，欢迎指正。