The movie is a very good sequel, solving the several mysterious settings in the first "Frozen" such as why only Elsa owns magic but Anna does not.
But this may not be enough to make a good movie; a strong story should do. The story I think is a little broken. Like, Why did the royal parent have to go north "for Elsa"? Forced to go or willing to go? This story ends in breaking a dam to connect peoples again, I know there was a prototype in real history, but is it a little strange that the grandfather's scheme has no necessary link with the parents' journey to the North? Have the directors been confused in telling the difference between fairy tales and environment protection documentaries?
Besides, songs in the movie are good and this is a merit in the first "Frozen". But too many songs may be a minus. I don't think some songs in some parts are necessary for the story, which only extend the length of the animation and undermine the story-telling which could be better.
Directors: Chris Buck, Jennifer Lee
没有评论:
发表评论