【#政治正确】Jordan Peterson debate on the gender pay gap, campus protests and postmodernism

==一句话完美解释什么是“政治正确”==

22:11':

English：

Cathy: You cited freedom of speech in that, why should your right to freedom of speech trump a trans-person's right not to be offended?
Jordan: Because in order to be able to think, you have to risk being offensive. I mean, look at the conversation we're having right now, you know like you're certainly willing to risk offending me in the pursuit of truth. Why should you have the right to do that? It's being rather uncomfortable.
Cathy: Well, I'm very glad I put you..., well, I'm...
Jordan: You get my point as like you're doing what you should do which is digging a bit to see what the hell is going on and that is what you should do but you're exercising your freedom of speech to certainly risk offending me and that's fine, I think more power to as far as I'm concerned.
Cathy: So you haven't said there and I'm sorry, I'm just trying to work that out, I mean...,
Jordan: Ha, gotcha.

中文： 

Cathy：你提到了言论自由，为什么你的言论自由权要凌驾于跨性别者不被冒犯的权利之上？
Jordan：因为为了能够思考，你必须冒犯他人的风险。我的意思是，看看我们现在的谈话，你知道，为了追求真相，你当然愿意冒犯我的风险。你为什么有权这样做？这很不舒服。
Cathy：嗯，我很高兴我把你……，嗯，我……
Jordan：你明白我的意思，因为你正在做你应该做的事情，即深入挖掘一下，看看到底发生了什么，这是你应该做的，但你正在行使你的言论自由，当然冒着冒犯我的风险，这很好，我认为就我而言，你还应该更大胆一些。
Cathy：所以你没有说，对不起，我只是想弄清楚，我的意思是……，
Jordan：哈，套住你了。